Featured

SAP Consultation (Period January 15th – February 26th 2018)

The revisions to the Site Allocations Plan (SAP) are out for consultation during the period January 15th to February 26th 2018. The Save Parlington Action Group invites you to add your name to a campaign to object to the proposed new town in the Parlington Estate, Aberford.

The form may be submitted by anyone, it is not a requirement of the consultation method to be a resident of Leeds. People from as far afield as Indonesia and South Africa have expressed their concern over the proposals to build a new town in the historic green belt of Parlington.

Please advise your friends and relatives for them to add their details all adults are eligible, as are all adult members of one household. The more people we get the harder it will be to proceed with the town. A number of people have submitted the form more than once, maybe due to over enthusiasm! Please don’t as it will only be deleted before being sent to Leeds City Council.

Update Monday 26th February, the objections now total over 1,300, but we cannot take any more through this page after midday today due to the ongoing printing and hand delivery to the council. You can send your own objection by email to: sap@leeds.gov.uk

Below is a transcript of the letter which will accompany the listing of objections, raised from this form.

Leeds SAP Revised Submission Draft Consultation Policy and Plans Group
The Leonardo Building,
2 Rossington Street,
Leeds LS2 8HD

Dear Mr Feeney,
Revised Submission Draft Plan – Specifically MX2-39/BL1-42 Parlington Estate
I have given my name and address on the reverse of this letter to indicate that, due to the reasons below, I believe that despite amendments Leeds Site Allocations Plan (SAP) with Parlington Estate in it still fails all four tests of soundness;

Leeds City Council (LCC) states that it requested a delay to Public Examination of its SAP in order to amend its approach “to ensure no unnecessary release of Green Belt sites in the Plan”. LCC’s Broad Location Methodology does NOT ensure this with respect to Parlington Estate and the ONE HMCA. Throughout the amended Plan documentation are references to development of the whole MX2-39 site and the capacity for 5,000 houses. The “Site” of 792 houses is referred to as “the first phase” and the “Broad Location” as “subsequent phases”. LCC has split the site in two, and claims that the Broad Location can be “saved” when the housing requirement is reduced. However, LCC also appears to view the release of future phases at Parlington as a necessary part of the development of the settlement. Local residents will either be stuck with a highly unsustainable settlement of 792 houses or the release of the Broad Location for houses that are no longer needed and
the unnecessary loss of highly valuable, irreplaceable Green Belt.

Even before concluding its Core Strategy Selective Review LCC acknowledges that it is aware that a revised target for housing need in Leeds will be greatly reduced. The Inspector has asked: “is there potential that land may be released from the Green Belt … that may not have been necessary had the selective review concluded first?”. MX2-39 is allocated to Phase 1 and contributes 350 houses to meet the future 5 year land supply. However, the 5 year land supply is based on the inflated and now discredited annual housing target. If the selective review had already concluded, LCC’s 5 year land supply requirement would be lower and no Green Belt sites would need to be released this early in the Plan period. In addition, LCC has admitted that it will actually exceed this overstated target by 5% by 2022/23 (5% of 47,643 homes is 2,382 houses). This over- allocation means LCC is unnecessarily releasing sites such as MX2-39 from the Green Belt. The Broad Location Methodology therefore fails to protect Green Belt sites from unnecessary release. LCC also details that there is a total of 13,272 homes delivered or under construction and total non-Green Belt allocated sites of 43,769, LCC is therefore aware that it will not have to release ANY Green Belt sites in order to meet the housing need for Leeds.

LCC claims that “sites on brownfield land are within phase 1…on phasing” although this is not a true statement for the ONE HMCA. Brownfield Site HG2-24 at Keswick Lane has been deleted as an identified site and re-designated a ‘Broad Location’ yet LCC state that Broad Locations “are a pool of sites, which remain in the Green Belt” Similarly a mixed site HG2-25 at Bramham has also been deleted as an identified site and re-designated as a Broad Location. By LCC’s own definition neither of these sites should be allocated as a Broad Location but should be moved to phase 1 allocated sites.

Since the submission of the draft SAP in May, Parlington Estate has been listed by Historic England as a Grade II Historic Park and Garden. Regardless of any request for a review by landowners with a pecuniary interest the listing remains in force. LCC should therefore be appraising the site as such and not disregard the listing as it appears to be doing.
In summary:

  • The Plan is STILL NOT POSITIVELY PREPARED for reasons that include its failure to align with the Adopted Core Strategy, failure to apply LCC’s own sustainability appraisal and its lack of a transport infrastructure plan;
  • The Plan is STILL NOT JUSTIFIED because a reduced site of 792 houses on MX2-39 has not been considered against reasonable alternative strategies and the site is no longer a strategic site;
  • The Plan is STILL NOT EFFECTIVE because MX2-39 has no inherent infrastructure – to deliver a single house will require a full provision of infrastructure and will therefore not be deliverable within the plan period;
  • The Plan is STILL NOT CONSISTENT WITH NATIONAL PLANNING POLICY because 792 houses on MX2-39 will be unable to economically support vital services, will be car dependent and therefore unsustainable.

Finally, I would like all future correspondence regarding Leeds SAP from either LCC or the Programme Officer to be sent through Save Parlington Action Group rather than to myself directly.

Yours Faithfully
On behalf of the named person(s) listed Overleaf

Featured

2017 Christmas Cards

christmas-cards-2017

The cards and calendars are on sale in various shops etc in Barwick in Elmet and Aberford also in Garforth and at the old coaching inn on the A64. Here is a list of places:

  • Aberford – The Arabian Horse, Aberford Interiors
  • Barwick – Laprie’s, Barwick Barbers, Maypole Deli, Options Hairdressers
  • Garforth – Cielo
  • York Road (A64) – The Fox and Grapes

Additionally for people who are unable to physically go to the various shops we are offering the cards for sale through the website here.

We are offering a set of four cards for £5.00 which includes postage in the UK, each card is A5 in size and is left blank for a personal message. The payment is via PayPal and is made to Brian Hull’s account from which the funds will be transferred to the Save Parlington Action Group bank.
Cards and Calendars are all sold out as of 21st December 2017.

2018 Parlington Calendars

calendar-composite
The 2018 Parlington calendars can be purchased from this site by clicking on the Buy Button below, please note that there are buttons for the calendar with this post, and the Christmas cards button is with that post, so do be sure to click on the correct one, of course you could click on both and get the calendar and cards! The price of the calendar delivered by post to UK is £6.75 [Calendar £5.00 + £1.75 pp]

Sorry calendars are now sold out!

2017 Christmas Cards of Parlington

Last year we made something of a “wow” with our Christmas cards of winter scenes in Parlington. This year we intend to do likewise and we hope they are as well received as those from 2016. The money raised by selling the cards has contributed to our fighting fund, this year’s cards will add to our reserves, to take on those who would destroy the greenbelt and historic landscape that is Parlington. A Parlington calendar for 2018 is on the blocks, so keep an eye out for it on Facebook or here.

Here is a preview of the four cards which will be on sale very soon.

SPAG AS XMAS-04

By Andy Sinclair

xmas17-as-snow-feb-2009-040

By Andy Sinclair

xmas17-P2208646-V2-lum2018

By Brian Hull

xmas17-PB296711-V2

By Brian Hull

Leeds Development Plans Panel

Save Parlington members will be at Civic Hall once again this afternoon (Tuesday 21st November 2017) for the Development Plans Panel meeting. We don’t expect to hear anything different to what we already know about the ‘new’ plans for Parlington. The panel are after all only being asked to note LCCs amendments. These amendments will undoubtedly be passed on to the Executive Board where they will be ‘considered’ on 13 December. Save Parlington will continue to lobby all Executive Board members in the meantime.

spag-image-fb-21-11-17

SAP Form Objection App

The SAP form App is now up and running, with many hundreds of visitors, I think it is fair to say its doing the job it was set up for. The principle idea behind the simple app is to allow people from literally anywhere on the planet, who have an Internet connection, to make an objection to the Parlington Development proposal, which unless we win, will be included in the Site Allocations Plan (SAP) by Leeds City Council.

Remember an objection can be concluded in a matter of a few minutes using the App, even if you re-structure the wording to your personal taste. Your objection may be sidelined by the council but the more we have the less likely this will be the case. We are aiming to exceed the November effort of 3,500 objections, can we double it?

If you use the site, please note that two domains go to the same place. i.e. village.parlington.co.uk and save-parlington.org this is because the former domain was set up first and continues, whilst the latter better expresses our intentions.

Parlington town will be a blot on the landscape for centuries if this proposal gets approval, your objection will be added to a call by the people of this country to get local government to listen to the people FIRST. They only govern with consent! The proposal in no way meets the criteria set out by the council themselves for a sustainable community. Also if you look at the SAP in total not just the North East Outer Area (HCMA) but the South East Outer Area as well, we believe the housing target is in the order of 20,000 homes. Anyone travelling by public transport or private knows that the area will be swamped by such massive development. Then there are all the support services which will be affected, schools, surgeries, dentists, etc! This is shear madness, you’ve got a week to object!

Ancient Roadway?

I posted this to Facebook:

I believe the hedgerow between the former Deer Park and the adjacent field, which runs roughly north south from Parlington Lane beyond the bank of beech trees by the east end of the Dark Arch towards Hook Moor. It looks like an ancient roadway, being a sunk pathway bounded on each side by hawthorn and fits well with my investigations into the use of Parlington Lane before the Dark Arch was built.

Additional Information

The area is outlined on the aerial view of the proposed site shown below. Essentially it appears to be a very old roadway, running from the corner of the field adjacent to an old pond near the east end of the Dark Arch towards Hook Moor. Additionally there is a sump by the pond which looks as if it was designed to collect water to be transferred to Parlington Lane. A cast iron pipe supplies the water, perhaps as a source of coolant for the train, after 1870. Bits of the system are still intact and there was a building nearby which is long gone. To anyone who knows the area it is by “Nellies Tree”. The building may have been introduced during WW2 and not be associated with the drainage system.

hedgerow

M & G Questionnaire, an Alternative

Although Howard Bedford recommended on FaceBook that no one completes the M & G Questionnaire we feel that an alternative form could be deposited with them which more accurately represents the issue being considered. You can download a “pdf” file here to print and complete to replace the one offered by the developer. You will need to provide a name and email address to obtain the file. The purpose is to offer the developers a more accurate assessment of public opinion and gather details of people where possible who have a view on the proposed development. The information will remain private and only be used for purposes of improving the number of objections to the Parlington Development.

The form is partially completed except for the box 9, where there is space for each visitor to fill in their details, this prevents the information from being used ad hoc by M & G. Also each of the response sections has sufficient space to add additional comments if wanted.

 

 

Response to point 5 of M & G’s Key points about Parlington Village

Comments on point 5, 160 hectares for building.

  1. The Parlington Estate extends to some 770 hectares. In the March submission to LCC only 160 ha of the housing development. This land is located at the centre of the estate and is currently used as arable farmland.

100 hectares = 1 sq. km

The submission (as stated above) is to build on 160 hectares = 1.6 sq. km.

If 1,850 houses are built, Parlington will have 1,850/1.6 = 1,156 houses per sq. km.

If each house is occupied by 2 people, the population density associated with the building in Parlington will be 2,312 people per sq. km. and 3,700 people in total over the 160 hectares.

If each house is occupied by 3 people, the population density associated with the building in Parlington will be 3,468 people per sq.km. and 5,550 people in total over the 160 hectares.

According to Wikipedia, in 2009, the population of Swarcliffe and Stanks was 6,751 people.

An additional comparator can be found in information from the ONS (Office for National Statistics) from 2011

http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20160105160709/http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171780_275367.pdf

UA/Met county/County Local Authority Total pop 000s Area (Sq km) People per sq km
East Riding of Yorkshire UA 339 2,408 141
Kingston upon Hull, City of UA 264 71 3,694
North East Lincolnshire UA 157 192 820
North Lincolnshire UA 161 846 191
York UA 202 272 744
North Yorkshire 600 8,038 75
North Yorkshire Craven 55 1,177 47
North Yorkshire Hambleton 88 1,311 67
North Yorkshire Harrogate 159 1,308 121
North Yorkshire Richmondshire 53 1,319 40
North Yorkshire Ryedale 54 1,507 36
North Yorkshire Scarborough 109 817 133
North Yorkshire Selby 83 599 138
South Yorkshire Met County 1,328 1,552 856
South Yorkshire Barnsley 228 329 692
South Yorkshire Doncaster 291 568 512
South Yorkshire Rotherham 255 287 889
South Yorkshire Sheffield 556 368 1,510
West Yorkshire Met County 2,250 2,029 1,109
West Yorkshire Bradford 513 366 1,399
West Yorkshire Calderdale 203 364 557
West Yorkshire Kirklees 410 409 1,003
West Yorkshire Leeds 799 552 1,448
West Yorkshire Wakefield 326 339 961

Thoughts on the M & G open session, Friday 7th October.

I attended the session at Aberford Village Hall on the above date. My early impressions are:

  1. M & G seemed to be promoting the village as though it’s a fait accompli, this applies particularly Mr Renshaw Watts;
  2. Attendees were requested to complete a questionnaire that was anonymous (nowhere to sign and leave contact details). I’m wary that any information derived from it could potentially be appropriated to validate a point that might be unintended by the responder;
  3. The plans as described by the main presenter were implausible. As an example – the fact that the site will have a single ingress/egress road to cater for potential car traffic and bus traffic for 1,850 homes (Is that feasible? Is that legal?).
  4. The Key Point about Parlington Village flyer doesn’t justify the destruction of the estate, and on closer inspection infers that the entire site’s use will be subject to change (see point 10 on side 2 of the flyer “…. woodland complemented by a network of pathways etc….”). It makes reference to a more extensive change to the estate and to further building beyond the houses, shops, healthcare facilities and even commercial buildings stated in the flyer. This information reinforces the questions in my point 3 above.

I hope to attend the meeting on Friday 14th October at the John Rylie Centre in Barwick. In the meantime, I’m keen to increase the level of discussion and requisite actions and start by suggesting that no one completes the M & G questionnaire.

The overriding message that the M & G team should be presented with, and take back to the estate’s owners, is that this destruction is not wanted, it is unnecessary and people in this area will not support M & G in realising an increased value of this asset to enhance the current M & G “£25.9 billion of assets” portfolio (words from M & G’s “Key Points about Parlington Village”).

Any proposal at Parlington will increase the burden of an already creaking road infrastructure around the M1, A63, A64 and A58.

I suggest that an alternative “Save Parlington” questionnaire is circulated, completed and deposited in the M & G intro (M & G’s physical receptacle for completed questionnaires in the room) on Friday.

HB